Laboratory fading rates of various luminescence signals from feldspar-rich sediment extracts

798 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

DRAC: Dose Rate and Age Calculator for trapped charge dating (2015, background): “Huntley and Baril, 1997) and the recent development of the post-IR IRSL protocol (Buylaert et al., 2009; Thomsen et al., 2008) and technological advances that facilitate single-grain K-feldspar dating, have resulted in efforts to precisely measure individual-grain internal K contents (e.”
Review and assessment of the potential of post-IR IRSL dating methods to circumvent the problem of anomalous fading in feldspar luminescence (2014, methodology): “This led to the development of a two-step post-IR IRSL dating method (Thomsen et al., 2008) in which an IR stimulation at a lower temperature (T1) is applied before measurement of the IRSL signal at a higher temperature (T2) (Table 1).”
Optical dating in archaeology: thirty years in retrospect and grand challenges for the future (2015, methodology): “Compared to the fast OSL component, the IRSL traps in feldspar bleach 246 both more slowly and less completely (Godfrey-Smith et al., 1988; Thomsen et al., 2008) and the most light-247 sensitive IRSL traps also suffer from a malign phenomenon known as ‘anomalous fading’ (Wintle, 1973; 248 Spooner,…”