Test-suite reduction and prioritization for modified condition/decision coverage

By James A. Jones, Mary Jean Harrold. Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance. ICSM 2001, 2001

479 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Guided GUI testing of android apps with minimal restart and approximate learning (2013, methodology): “Test suite reduction techniques [46, 51, 55, 56, 59, 74, 104, 105, 118, 126] automatically reduce the size of a test suite without losing the coverage of the test suite.”
Differential symbolic execution (2008, background): “Test cases are generally removed because they are redundant; a test case t is redundant with respect to a set of test cases T if the set of test case requirements covered by t is a subset of the set of test case requirements covered by T [37].”
Regression testing minimization, selection and prioritization: a survey (2012, methodology): “Jones and Harrold applied the greedy-based prioritization approach to Modified Condition/ Decision Coverage (MC/DC) criterion [124].”
Selecting a Cost-Effective Test Case Prioritization Technique (2004, methodology): “[8] describe a technique for prioritizing test cases for use with the modified condition/decision coverage (MCDC) criteria, this technique uses feedback, but no modification information.”