Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma

By W. Marston Linehan, P. Spellman, C. Ricketts, Chad Creighton, S. Fei, Caleb F. Davis, D. Wheeler, Bradley A. Murray, L. Schmidt, C. Vocke and 218 more. New England Journal of Medicine, 2015

1,150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Background Papillary renal cell carcinoma, accounting for 15% of renal cell carcinoma, is a heterogeneous disease consisting of different types of renal cancer, including tumors with indolent, multifocal presentation and solitary tumors with an aggressive, highly lethal phenotype. Little is known about the genetic basis of sporadic papillary renal cell carcinoma; no effective forms of therapy for advanced disease exist. Methods We performed comprehensive molecular characterization utilizing whole-exome sequencing, copy number, mRNA, microRNA, methylation and proteomic analyses of 161 primary papillary renal cell carcinomas. Results Type 1 and Type 2 papillary renal cell carcinomas were found to be different types of renal cancer characterized by specific genetic alterations, with Type 2 further classified into three individual subgroups based on molecular differences that influenced patient survival. MET alterations were associated with Type 1 tumors, whereas Type 2 tumors were characterized by CDKN2A silencing, SETD2 mutations, TFE3 fusions, and increased expression of the NRF2-ARE pathway. A CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) was found in a distinct subset of Type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma characterized by poor survival and mutation of the fumarate hydratase (FH) gene. Conclusions Type 1 and Type 2 papillary renal cell carcinomas are clinically and biologically distinct. Alterations in the MET pathway are associated with Type 1 and activation of the NRF2-ARE pathway with Type 2; CDKN2A loss and CIMP in Type 2 convey a poor prognosis. Furthermore, Type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma consists of at least 3 subtypes based upon molecular and phenotypic features.

Subfields: Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f6252ae4d71a1580734b7723c356ecbffee69577

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Epidemiology

  1. Pedro C. Barata
  2. C. Porta
  3. B. Rini

In Molecular Biology

  1. Rui Kuang
  2. Wei Zhang
  3. Jeongsik Yong
  4. Jeremy Chien
  5. B. Rini

In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

  1. Pedro C. Barata
  2. Rui Kuang
  3. Wei Zhang
  4. Jeongsik Yong
  5. Jeremy Chien
  6. B. Rini

Citations in the corpus