Revealing additional dimensions of preference heterogeneity in a latent class mixed multinomial logit model

244 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

It’s not that I don’t care, I just don’t care very much: confounding between attribute non-attendance and taste heterogeneity (2013, methodology): “To deal with this limitation, we put forward a framework that combines a continuous mixed logit model with a latent class model (see Greene and Hensher 2010 or Bujosa et al. 2011 for recent discussions of such a structure in a more general context).”
Latent class structures: taste heterogeneity and beyond (2014, methodology): “…as straightforward to capture in a latent class framework, and this, along with a desire for more flexible specifications of heterogeneity, has motivated work on combining the two approaches, for example in Walker and Li (2006); Bujosa et al. (2010); Greene and Hensher (2013); Hess et al. (2013b).”
Are consumers willing to pay to let cars drive for them? Analyzing response to autonomous vehicles (2017, methodology): “The approach adopted to unobserved preference heterogeneity in this paper thus takes into consideration a mixed-mixed logit model (Bujosa et al., 2010; Greene and Hensher, 2013; Keane and Wasi, 2013), where the random willingness-to-pay parameters are distributed according to a Gaussian mixture.”