Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and after-effects in high-level vision
By Colin W. G. Clifford, Gillian Rhodes. 2005
294 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5f2c7a7e8988661a7bc5c10cbb1d0b4138ddb4e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Michael A. Webster
- William G. Hayward
- Emma Jaquet
- Gillian Rhodes
- Kai-Markus Müller
- L. Jeffery
- David A. Leopold
- Odelia Schwartz
Citations in the corpus
- Race-contingent aftereffects suggest distinct perceptual norms for different race faces (2008, methodology): “Adaptation techniques have been widely utilized in visual research to elucidate the organization of neural coding mechanisms, and to illustrate the dynamic nature of our visual representations (for a recent review see Clifford & Rhodes, 2005).”
- Recognition of natural scenes from global properties: Seeing the forest without representing the trees (2008, unknown): “…processing for entities that seem to have dedicated processing, from basic properties such as color, motion, orientation and spatial frequency (for a review, see Wade & Verstraten, 2005) to complex features such as facial emotion and identity ([Leopold et al., 2001] and [Webster et al., 2004]).”
- Visual adaptation: neural, psychological and computational aspects. (2007, background): “These novel stimuli are the very features of the world to which we are not currently adapted, so much of what we notice about the world arguably amounts to a visual ‘aftereffect’ (Webster et al., 2005).”
- The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces (2005, methodology): “In this case, however, the faces were greyscale photographs morphed using GRYPHONMORPH, and the average was formed from a pool of 20 male faces (for more details see Rhodes et al. 2005).”
- Adaptation and visual coding (2011, background): “Finally, these compensations highlight an important asymmetry of visual adaptationVthat it is the observer that is adjusted to match the world (Clifford & Rhodes, 2005) and thus that variations in the environment may be more important than variations in visual sensitivity for controlling some…”