Towards Lower Error Rates in Phoneme Recognition
By Petr Schwarz, Pavel Matejka, Jan Honza Cernocký. 2004
141 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Speech & Audio, Signal Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Speech & Audio
In Signal Processing
Citations in the corpus
- Improving Transformer-based Speech Recognition Using Unsupervised Pre-training (2019, background): “Note downsampling would usually hurt the accuracy of speech recognition system [22, 23] and results for AISHELL-1 is usually reported on the original 16kHz data.”
- A General Survey on Attention Mechanisms in Deep Learning (2022, methodology): “In the field of audio processing, the Word Error Rate [110] and Phoneme Error Rate [111] are generally employed.”
- Interpretation of Multiparty Meetings the AMI and Amida Projects (2008, background): “These so-called left context – right context (LCRC) features [13] are derived from multiple stages of MLPs that try to estimate phoneme state posterior probabilities.”
- Probabilistic and Bottle-Neck Features for LVCSR of Meetings (2007, methodology): “The use of phoneme model states as classes is proposed in [6].”
- Query-by-example spoken term detection using phonetic posteriorgram templates (2009, methodology): “The authors would like to thank Fred Richardson for his help training and running the BUT phonetic recognizer.”
- Optimizing bottle-neck features for lvcsr (2008, methodology): “Since their introduction, several modifications targeting the input spectro gram [3, 4], the MLP structure [5] and MLP training targets [6] were propo sed.”
- The language-independent bottleneck features (2012, methodology): “ANN Parameterization TRAPs-DCT features [12] were used as ANN input: The parameters are 15 log Mel-filterbank”