Consumption-Based Accounting and the Trade-Carbon Emissions Nexus in Asia: A Heterogeneous, Common Factor Panel Analysis

By Brantley Liddle. Sustainability, 2018

352 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper considers a recently developed consumption-based carbon emissions database from which emissions calculations are made based on the domestic use of fossil fuels plus the embodied emissions from imports minus exports, to test directly for the importance of trade in national emissions. The People’s Republic of China (PRC) alone is responsible for over half the global outflows of carbon via trade. The econometric estimations—which focused on a panel of 20 Asian countries—determined that: (i) trade flows were significant for consumption-based emissions but not for territory-based emissions; and (ii) exports and imports offset each other in that exports lower consumption-based emissions, whereas imports increase them. Hence, all countries should have both an interest and a responsibility to help lower the carbon intensity of energy in countries that are particularly important for global carbon transfers—the PRC and India.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5d2a823dd9ea1224b25a034dc1d7761680a2293

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Muhammad Shahbaz
  2. Avik Sinha
  3. Arshian Sharif
  4. Zhilun Jiao
  5. Y. Wolde‐Rufael
  6. Shekhar Mishra
  7. Sahar Afshan
  8. Ilhan Ozturk

In Environmental Engineering

  1. Muhammad Shahbaz
  2. Avik Sinha
  3. Arshian Sharif
  4. Zhilun Jiao
  5. Adnan Safi
  6. Y. Wolde‐Rufael
  7. Sebastian Mader
  8. Maaz Amin

Citations in the corpus