Comparing plumage colour measurements obtained directly from live birds and from collected feathers: the case of the great tit Parus major

By J. Quesada, J. Senar. 2006

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5ba25dd44612c503b7033f207b7278a52c9af42

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. A. Córdoba‐Aguilar

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Jorge Contreras-Garduño
2. M. Serrano-Meneses
3. Bruno A. Buzatto
4. Karla Nájera-Cordero
5. A. Córdoba‐Aguilar

Citations in the corpus

• Growing in Cities: An Urban Penalty for Wild Birds? A Study of Phenotypic Differences between Urban and Rural Great Tit Chicks (Parus major) (2017, unknown): “A set of four feathers was randomly chosen among each sample, and piled up to reflect the bird’s plumage (Quesada and Senar, 2006), with their rachis superimposed and parallel to each other.”
• The size of the red wing spot of the American rubyspot as a heightened condition-dependent ornament (2008, methodology): “Each measurement takes approximately 1.5 s while the interval between measurements is 4 s. Color measurements that this device is based on are defined according to the CIELab system (Anderson and Prager 2006; Quesada and Senar 2006).”