Anxiety versus Fundamental Emotions as Predictors of Perceived Functionality of Pre-Competitive Emotional States, Threat, and Challenge in Individual Sports

By Ester Cerin. 2003

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The objectives of this study were to examine the contribution of anxiety and fundamental emotions to perceived emotion functionality and evaluate the informational value of anxiety measures used in sport versus measures of fundamental emotions in terms of appraisal. A battery of questionnaires comprising the somatic and cognitive subscale of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 (CSAI-2), the State Anxiety Inventory, the Differential Emotions Scale-IV, a perceived functionality of emotions single item, and two items assessing challenge and threat appraisals was administered to 202 athletes competing in individual sports in the United Kingdom. They were tested on recalled pre-competitive emotions experienced before their best and worst competition ever and momentary emotions experienced one hour before an actual competition. In general, measures of fundamental emotions with clear approach or avoidance action tendencies were better predictors of emotion functionality than anxiety measures. Results also suggested that the CSAI-2 does not convey clear information about an athlete's appraisal of a competition. Measures of negative and positive fundamental emotions with clear action tendencies were better indicators of athletes' appraisal patterns. It was concluded that assessment of athletes' emotional state should not be exclusively based on anxiety measures but should encompass or be replaced with measures of emotions conveying unambiguous information about the athlete-competition relationship.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5a428570578be3673d6dd38b86fee9d80dd5174

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

  1. P. McCarthy
  2. L. Bortoli
  3. F. Guillén
  4. E. Chavez
  5. Sylvain Laborde
  6. David Sheffield
  7. Marc V Jones
  8. Fabrice Dosseville

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

  1. P. McCarthy
  2. L. Bortoli
  3. C. Ferrand
  4. M. Campo
  5. G. Martinent
  6. C. Robazza
  7. F. Guillén
  8. E. Chavez

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. F. Guillén
  2. E. Chavez
  3. Sylvain Laborde
  4. P. McCarthy
  5. David Sheffield
  6. Fabrice Dosseville
  7. L. Bortoli
  8. C. Robazza

Citations in the corpus