Avoiding False Negatives: Are Some Auditory Hallucinations an Evolved Design Flaw?

By G. Dodgson, Sue Gordon. 2009

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Ben Alderson-Day
2. Charles Fernyhough
3. S. Wilkinson
4. V. Bell

In Neuroscience

1. Ben Alderson-Day
2. S. Wilkinson
3. V. Bell
4. Charles Fernyhough

Citations in the corpus

• Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015, background): “…(Jones, 2010), with only some forms of the phenomenon being explicable in terms of misattributed inner speech: others may be better understood in terms of a “hypervigilant” attention to external threat (Dodgson & Gordon, 2009), or intrusions from memory (Michie, Badcock, Waters, & Maybery, 2005).”
• The Representation of Agents in Auditory Verbal Hallucinations (2016, background): “Other cases where agency, but not any distinguishable agent, is represented, are in what Dodgson and Gordon (2009) call ‘hypervigilance’ hallucinations.”
• Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Auditory Verbal Hallucinations as Atypical Inner Speech Monitoring, and the Potential of Neurostimulation as a Treatment Option (unknown): “…it is possible that some AVHs can best be described as misattributed inner speech, whereas others might best be described as intrusive memories (Waters et al., 2006), and others still as 'hypervigilance' towards detecting stimuli in the environment (Dodgson and Gordon, 2009; Garwood et al., 2013).”