Monotone Funktionen, Stieltjessche Integrale und harmonische Analyse
By S. Bochner. 1933
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Bharath K. Sriperumbudur
- Francis R. Bach
- David Lopez-Paz
- Krikamol Muandet
- Kenji Fukumizu
- Arthur Gretton
- Yoshua Bengio
Citations in the corpus
- Kernel Mean Embedding of Distributions: A Review and Beyonds (2016, background): “When the kernel k is translation invariant on Rd, i.e., k(x,x′) = ψ(x − x′), x,x′ ∈ Rd, the kernel can be characterized by Bochner’s theorem (Bochner 1933), which states that any bounded continuous kernel k is the inverse Fourier transform of some finite non-negative Borel measure.”
- Quasi-Monte Carlo Feature Maps for Shift-Invariant Kernels (2014, background): “The starting point of Rahimi & Recht (2007) is a celebrated result that characterizes the class of positive definite functions: Theorem 1 (Bochner (1933)).”
- Kernel methods in machine learning (2007, neutral): “A variation of Bochner’s theorem, stated by Wendland [152], then tells us that the measure corresponding to h has a nonvanishing density υ with respect to the Lebesgue measure, that is, that k can be written as k(x,x′) = ∫ e−i〈x−x ′,ω〉υ(ω)dω = ∫ e−i〈x,ω〉e−i〈x′,ω〉υ(ω)dω.”
- Random Laplace Feature Maps for Semigroup Kernels on Histograms (2014, methodology): “Their construction is based on a classical characterization of the family of positive-definite functions on Rd given by Bochner’s Theorem [2].”
- On potentially negative space time covariances obtained as sum of products of marginal ones (2008, methodology): “Instead of using Bernstein’s formula (5), one can use the Lévy-Khinchine formula for conditionally positive definite functions (see e.”
- Local Group Invariant Representations via Orbit Embeddings (2016, methodology): “Bochner’s theorem establishes Fourier transform as a bijective map from finite non-negative Borel measures on Rd to positive definite functions on Rd. Applying it to shift-invariant positive definite kernels one gets k(x, x′) = k̃(x− x′) = ∫ Rd e−i(x−x ′)>ωp(ω)dω, ∀x, x′, (5) where p(·) is the uniqu”
- Convolution roots of radial positive definite functions with compact support (2004, background): “for all nite systems of complex numbers c1;::: ;cn and points x1;::: ;xn 2 R d . Conversely, Bochner’s theorem [ 10 ] states that every such function ’ is the Fourier transform of a probability measure F on R d . If ’ is integrable then F has a continuous density given by f = F 1 d ’. Since a positi”
- Randomized numerical linear algebra: Foundations and algorithms (2020, methodology): “A classic result from analysis, Bochner’s theorem (Bôchner 1933), gives a characterization of these kernels.”
- Characterization and construction of radial basis functions (2001, background): “On the other hand, Bochner’s characterization provides direct proofs for translation–invariant and possibly nonradial functions, but is not applicable to conditionally positive definite functions.”
- Stationary covariances associated with exponentially convex functions (2003, background): “By a classical theorem of Bochner (1933), a continuous function is positive definite if and only if it is of the form j(t) ¼ ð eir t dF(r), t 2 Rd , (3) where F is a non-negative measure on Rd .”
- Solving PDEs with radial basis functions * (2015, unknown): “Following Bochner (1933), we will first show that the RBF matrix A = φ(‖x1 − x1‖) φ(‖x1 − x2‖) · · · φ(‖x1 − xN‖) φ(‖x2 − x1‖) φ(‖x2 − x2‖) · · · φ(‖x2 − xN‖) ... ... ... φ(‖xN − x1‖) φ(‖xN − x2‖) · · · φ(‖xN − xN‖) (2.5) is guaranteed to be non-singular for GA RBFs, no matter how the nodes…”