Modelling sexual segregation in ungulates: effects of group size, activity budgets and synchrony

By K. Ruckstuhl, Hanna Kokko. 2002

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f598ce79cbdf4439d094d0680f01c0dd1d79c551

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Terry Bowyer
2. Andrew J. King
3. G. Cowlishaw
4. R. Terry Bowyer
5. J. Kie

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Andrew J. King
2. G. Cowlishaw
3. Terry Bowyer

In Small Animals

1. Terry Bowyer
2. Andrew J. King

Citations in the corpus

• SEXUAL SEGREGATION IN RUMINANTS: DEFINITIONS, HYPOTHESES, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT (2004, methodology): “…separate social groups outside the mating season]—Conradt 1998a) involving differences in synchrony and activity patterns of sexes have been used to define and explain sexual segregation (Conradt 1998a; Conradt and Roper 2000; Ruckstuhl 1998; Ruckstuhl and Kokko 2002; Ruckstuhl and Neuhaus 2000).”
• Social relationships and reproductive state influence leadership roles in movements of plains zebra, Equus burchellii (2007, unknown): “A central problem in the study of social animals is characterizing the roles of individuals in producing collective behaviours such as group movements (Schaller 1963; Kummer 1968; Prins 1996), cooperative breeding (Covas et al. 2004) or activity synchrony (Co ˆte ´ et al. 1997; Ruckstuhl & Kokko 20”
• All together now: behavioural synchrony in baboons. (2009, background): “Ruckstuhl 1999; Ruckstuhl & Kokko 2002; Michelena et al. 2006).”