Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives

By J. Toby. 2005

171 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f58320003e3ef0511d31bc514ed782578067bf39

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anthropology

Citations in the corpus

How Well Do Criminologists Explain Crime? Statistical Modeling in Published Studies (2008, background): “The chain of causal events involves many factors that can have varied effects and thus make long-term prediction difficult (Laub and Sampson 2003).35 If we could explain only 20 percent of the variance in human decision making and a statistical study using some constellation of variables had an R2…”
The pains of desistance (2016, background): “Although there is increasing evidence of the positive influence a girlfriend can have on helping the desistance process (Bottoms and Shapland, 2014; Laub and Sampson, 2003), there is less research on the effect that this may have on the person in question (Halsey and Deegan, 2015).”
Religion, Self Control, and Substance Use (2013, background): “In addition, religious conversion or increases in religious belief have been identified as factors in desistence from crime (Laub and Sampson 2003).”
Reflections on social values, offending and desistance among young adult recidivists (2011, background): “We begin by noting the substantial recent evidence that even persistent offenders often sharply decrease their levels of offending during the decade between the ages of 20 and 30 (Ezell and Cohen, 2005; Laub and Sampson, 2003; Piquero et al., 2007: 136).”
Recovery and desistance: what the emerging recovery movement in the alcohol and drug area can learn from models of desistance from offending (2017, unknown): “As a result of a re-examination of the Glueck’s data, Sampson and Laub rein-vigorated rehabilitative discourse (Sampson & Laub 2003; Laub & Sampson 2006), by scrutinising the contextual factors around the age-crime relationship.”
Criminal Careers in Organized Crime and Social Opportunity Structure (2008, background): “Opinions, however, differ concerning the theoretical relevance of this approach (Laub and Sampson 2003; Sampson and Laub 2005; Nagin and Tremblay 2005).”