Mechanical behavior of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene fused deposition materials modeling
By José Francisco Rodríguez, James P. Thomas, John E. Renaud. 2003
328 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Polymers and Plastics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5713a656291b652ce0a699ff75b9af03935797e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
- Chao Gao
- Josef Kiendl
- Marcin P. Serdeczny
- David Bue Pedersen
- Jon Spangenberg
- Raphaël Comminal
- Luca Costato
- Michael Rory Dawson
In Mechanical Engineering
- Josef Kiendl
- Chao Gao
- Marcin P. Serdeczny
- David Bue Pedersen
- Raphaël Comminal
- Jon Spangenberg
- Luca Costato
- Michael Rory Dawson
In Polymers and Plastics
Citations in the corpus
- Raster angle mechanics in fused deposition modelling (2015, background): “Substituting equations (20) and (21) into equation (6) to (8)”
- Influence of meso-structure and chemical composition on FDM 3D-printed parts (2017, background): “The bonding between neighboring fibers occurs by a thermally-driven diffusion process during solidification of the semi-molten extruded fiber [6,22].”
- Controlling toughness and strength of FDM 3D-printed PLA components through the raster layup (2020, background): “So far, most researchers considered FDM materials as composite laminates and used classical lamination theory for its analysis [9,11,22,23], where the validity is restricted to linear elastic analysis.”
- Tensile properties and failure behavior of chopped and continuous carbon fiber composites produced by additive manufacturing (2019, background): “As shown in several studies [32] [33] [34] [35] [36], the integrity and mechanical properties of AM parts are directly related to the mesostructure of fused filament fabricated parts, i.”
- Evaluation and prediction of the tensile properties of continuous fiber-reinforced 3D printed structures (2016, methodology): “These studies have evaluated both commercial FDM 3D printers [3-5] as well as low-cost desktop 3D printers [2].”