FITNESS IMPACTS OF HERBIVORY THROUGH INDIRECT EFFECTS ON PLANT–POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS IN OENOTHERA MACROCARPA

By Kristine Mothershead, R. Marquis. 2000

347 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5683e367395673aa7017eaa301460f5386c8496

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

How do belowground organisms influence plant–pollinator interactions? (2015, positive): “Such changes in floral traits may reduce pollinator attraction and, consequently, plant fitness (Kessler and Halitschke 2009; Lehtila and Strauss 1997; Mothershead and Marquis 2000; Strauss et al. 1996; Strauss and Murch 2004).”
Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biology (2006, positive): “…have demonstrated the occurrence of indirect effects between sympatric native species (e.g. Levin & Anderson, 1970; Campbell, 1985; Thomas, 1986; Mothershead & Marquis, 2000; Veech, 2000; Adler et al., 2001; Morris, 2002; Webster & Almany, 2002; LoGuidice, 2003; Lombadero et al., 2003; Rand,…”
Direct and indirect effects of pollinators and seed predators to selection on plant and floral traits (2004, methodology): “1, based on previous studies examining the relationships among plant and floral characters, pollination, seed predation, and/or plant reproduction in other systems (Schemske and Horvitiz 1988, Mothershead and Marquis 2000, Adler et al. 2001).”
DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS OF ALKALOIDS ON PLANT FITNESS VIA HERBIVORY AND POLLINATION (2001, methodology): “…that pollinators can distinguish between plants on the basis of prior herbivory, and prefer to visit less damaged plants (Miao et al. 1991, Karban and Strauss 1993, Lohman and Berenbaum 1996, Strauss et al. 1996, 1999, Juenger and Bergelson 1997, Krupnick et al. 1999, Mothershead and Marquis 2000).”
Indirect effects of an introduced ungulate on pollination and plant reproduction (2004, methodology): “…us to evaluate the structure of causal relationships among a group of variables; it has been used in many previous studies involving pollination and plant reproduction (Schemske and Horvitz 1988, Mitchell 1992, 2001, Herrera 1993, Brody 1997, Gómez and Zamora 2000, Mothershead and Marquis 2000).”
Multiple Effects of Introduced Mammalian Herbivores in a Temperate Forest (2002, background): “Besides the direct effect on individual plant survivorship, herbivores can affect plant fitness, both directly by consuming flowers or seeds (Louda 1982; Herrera 1993, 2000; Gómez and Zamora 2000) and indirectly by affecting the interaction with pollinators through a modification of floral traits (S”
Effects of Florivory on the Pollination of Flowers: An Experimental Field Study with a Perennial Plant (2010, background): “…and flowers of many other plants, including rough-leaved velvetseed Guet- tarda scabra (S. Koptur, unpublished data), flowers of sabal palm, saw palmetto, and silver palm (S. Koptur and R. Khorsand, unpublished data), and the native cycad, coontie Zamia pumila (Negron-Ortiz and Gorchov 2000).”
Deciphering Chemical Language of Plant Communication (2016, background): “This communication is mediated by floral display, and herbivory to vegetative parts can interfere with this display and with pollinator visitation (Lehtilä and Strauss 1997; Mothershead and Marquis 2000; Poveda et al. 2003, 2005).”
Optimal defence theory and flower petal colour predict variation in the secondary chemistry of wild radish (2004, background): “1999; Mothershead & Marquis 2000; Adler et al .”
A mutualism's indirect costs: the most aggressive plant bodyguards also deter pollinators (2006, background): “For example, foliar herbivory can influence floral traits (Strauss 1997, Mothershead and Marquis 2000), and natural enemies can exert selection pressures that run counter to that exerted by pollinators (Gomez 2003, Cariveau et al. 2004).”