Science on stage : expert advice as public drama

By H. Schmidgen. 2003

287 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f5645c7ec3ce7866a1a379e7a6df61b375b9650b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Do economists make policies? On the political effects of economics (2014, background): “…most influential when debates remain technical and are not overtly politicized (Nelkin, 1975; Keller, 2009), and emphasizes the strategies used by scientists to demarcate science from non-science in order to acquire or maintain policy influence (Gieryn, 1999; Hilgartner, 2000; Bijker et al., 2009).”
“The Intention Was Good”: Legitimacy, Consensus-Based Decision Making, and the Case of Forest Planning in British Columbia, Canada (2004, background): “This public–expert tension poses a dilemma familiar to those who study the role of expert opinion in democracies (for example, see Hilgartner 2000 and Jasanoff 1990).”
The Relevance of Algorithms (2013, background): “O que pode parecer uma explicação clara sobre que acontece por trás dos bastidores pode não ser realmente uma visada do verdadeiro processo que ali se dá, mas de “bastidores performados” (HILGARTNER, 2000) e cuidadosamente elaborados a fim de legitimar ainda mais esse processo e seus resultados.”
When transparency and collaboration collide: The USA Open Data program (2011, background): “…bureaucrats know when and how to release data, stories, and forecasts as part of their efforts to increase their agencies’ autonomy and reputation (Hilgartner, 2000, p. 20; Krause & Douglas, 2005, p. 23; Moffitt, 2010; Rourke & Edward, 1961, p. 127; Schneider & Ingram, 1990, pp. 517–519; Stone,…”
Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability (2018, background): “Such transparency can be performative—as Hilgartner (2000: 6) describes the “dra-matic techniques” of science policy advisors practicing openness to establish authority as experts—or co-opted by special interests using open data (Levy and Johns, 2016) and scientific norms of data sharing to advance…”
Performing the economy, performing science: from neoclassical to supply chain models in the agrifood sector (2007, methodology): “Hilgartner (2000), in particular, using an approach reminiscent of Goffman, has argued that technoscience is often ‘on stage’.”
Policy mixes for incumbency: Exploring the destructive recreation of renewable energy, shale gas ‘fracking,’ and nuclear power in the United Kingdom (2017, unknown): “But they may also be destructive, in that associated policy performances can continue in their own self-sufficient fashion, without necessarily effecting any real-world change (Hilgartner 2000).”