Predictive modelling of freshwater fish as a biomonitoring tool in New Zealand

By M. Joy, R. Death. 2002

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f53597e5da250d63f3ee8b9183cc001b3fa57748

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. I. Cowx
2. S. Schmutz
3. D. Pont
4. G. Haidvogl
5. G. Grenouillet

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. S. Schmutz
2. I. Cowx
3. G. Grenouillet
4. D. Pont
5. G. Haidvogl
6. D. Goffaux
7. P. Kestemont

Citations in the corpus

• Fish‐based methods for assessing European running waters: a synthesis (2007, methodology): “Discriminant function analyses have also been used in other studies to find pressure variables that best differentiate among IBI classes (e.g. Joy & Death 2002 ).”
• A review of existing fish assemblage indicators and methodologies (2007, background): “This is questionable because the combination of multiple parameters can have a significant influence on fish assemblage structure, response of metrics and IBI variations (Belpaire et al. 2000; Lyons et al. 2000; Oberdorff et al. 2001; Joy & Death 2002).”