Diversity Pays in Crop Pollination
By C. Westerkamp, G. Gottsberger. 2000
149 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f52c0b9dc64519f382b22061b39e2049831b6faf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Genetics
In Insect Science
Citations in the corpus
- WILD BEE ABUNDANCE AND SEED PRODUCTION IN CONVENTIONAL, ORGANIC, AND GENETICALLY MODIFIED CANOLA (2005, result): “Our findings support recent concerns over the economic consequences of native bee declines (e.g., Westerkamp and Gottsberger 2000, Kevan and Phillips 2001).”
- The future of pollinators for Australian agriculture (2002, background): “Some authors have argued that the role of Apis (relative to other pollinators) is generally overstated, because of ignorance about non-Apis pollinators (Westerkamp and Gottsberger 2000).”
- Pollination services in the UK: how important are honeybees? (2011, background): “…greater proportion of pollination services than previously thought, even in modern, intensive farm systems (e.g. Winfree et al , 2008) prompting some to suggest that the importance of honeybees in providing pollination services may have been over estimated (Westerkamp and Gottsberger, 2000).”
- Pollinator-friendly management does not increase the diversity of farmland bees and wasps (2015, background): “Recent work has also highlighted the importance of a diverse pollinator community for providing a high quality pollination service (Westerkamp and Gottsberger, 2000; Klein et al., 2003; Hoehn et al., 2008; Garibaldi et al., 2013).”