Antipredator behaviour of 0+ year Perca fluviatilis: effect of vegetation density and turbidity

By M. Snickars, A. Sandström, J. Mattila. 2004

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Effects of structural heterogeneity provided by the floating macrophyte Eichhornia azurea on the predation efficiency and habitat use of the small Neotropical fish Moenkhausia sanctaefilomenae (2009, background): “... provided by the vegetation has deep implications for community structures (e.g., Vieira et al., 2007), affecting the spatial distribution and survival of prey (Grabowski & Powers, 2004; Warfe & Barmuta, 2006) and predators (Sammons & Maceina, 2006), bottom-up and top-down processes (Jeppesen et ”
Seasonal fluctuations in macrophyte cover and water transparency of four brown-water lakes: implications for crustacean zooplankton in littoral and pelagic habitats (2009, background): “It has been shown, for instance, that the refuge effect of macrophytes decreases when clay turbidity increases (Snickars et al., 2004; PekcanHekim, 2007).”
The Effects of Turbidity on Prey Selection by Piscivorous Largemouth Bass (2009, background): “…(Swenson 1978; Matthews 1984; Miner and Stein 1996), reduce their use of cover (Gradall and Swenson 1982; Johnson et al. 1988; Gregory 1993; Snickars et al. 2004), or reduce school cohesiveness (Vandenbyllaardt et al. 1991) as turbidity increases— presumably because turbidity reduces the…”