Social justice and the distribution of income
By Amartya Sen. 2000
172 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f50d4fd4a4be690156f417ecd5fb6d994f4fab39
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- James J. Heckman
- Pedro Carneiro
- Karsten Hansen
- P. Segal
- S. Anand
- I. Robeyns
- Erik Schokkaert
- Malte Lübker
In Sociology and Political Science
- James J. Heckman
- Pedro Carneiro
- P. Segal
- Karsten Hansen
- I. Robeyns
- S. Anand
- Erik Schokkaert
- Malte Lübker
Citations in the corpus
- Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined (2017, background): “12 E.g. Anand and Sen (1994, 2000); Robeyns and Van der Veen (2007); Scholtes (2010); Schlosberg and Carruthers (2010); Rauschmayer, Omann and Frühmann (2012); Schlosberg (2012); Crabtree (2013); Voget-Kleschin (2013, 2015); Schultz et al. (2013); Holland (2014).”
- Capabilities and Satisfaction with Life (2007, background): “Therefore, there is a real chance that economics (and other social sciences) in the near future will give up its ‘‘laziness’’ and will start ‘‘living up to its utilitarian foundations’’ (Sen, 2000, p. 67).”
- Inequality and the Demand for Redistribution: Are the Assumptions of the New Growth Theory Valid? (2007, background): “For example, Svallfors (1993) demonstrates that the British are prepared to accept far greater income differences than the Swedish would tolerate.”
- The Global Distribution of Income (2014, background): “They posited a “world social welfare function,” which exhibits a changing social marginal valuation of income at different points along the global income distribution (see also Anand and Sen, 2000).”
- Removing the Veil of Ignorance in Assessing the Distributional Impacts of Social Policies (2002, methodology): “Our research advances the existing literature on evaluating the distributional consequences of alternative policies beyond the “Veil of Ignorance” assumption used in modern welfare economics (See Atkinson 1970, Sen 1997, 2000).”