The significance of infection related to orthopedic devices and issues of antibiotic resistance.
By D. Campoccia, L. Montanaro, C. R. Arciola. Biomaterials, 2006
1,111 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Epidemiology, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f504cb3dc1157dcbffd15bc7cb5a377851f113c3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Yafei Luan
- S. Puckett
- Hamza Chouirfa
- Sidi Liu
- Erik N. Taylor
- M. Pihl
- Houssam Bouloussa
- H. Mei
Citations in the corpus
- The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment. (2010, background): “epidermidis) are well documented in the clinical orthopedic setting [17,18].”
- Biofilm formation in Staphylococcus implant infections. A review of molecular mechanisms and implications for biofilm-resistant materials. (2012, background): “Implant mobilisation and failure are often determined by infections that, once become chronic, do not respond any longer to debridement and conventional systemic antibiotic therapy [6].”
- Biofilms: Microbial Cities of Scientific Significance (2014, background): “such as urinary catheters and orthopedic devices [8].”
- Review of titanium surface modification techniques and coatings for antibacterial applications. (2019, background): “implant loosening, detachment or even dislocations.[11] Difficulties raised by the diagnosis of implant-”
- Infection of orthopedic implants with emphasis on bacterial adhesion process and techniques used in studying bacterial-material interactions (2012, background): “They represent, in absolute, the main causative agents in orthopedics.(16,17) While this review relates to bacteria in general, more emphasis is given to S.”
- Bacterial interactions with nanostructured surfaces (2018, background): “12,13 Since the frequency of these procedures is increasing, revisions of total hip and total knee arthroplasties are estimated to increase at rates as high as 137% and 601%, respectively between 2005 and 2030 14 at almost double costs compared to primary arthroplasties.”