A Simple Phenomenological Emergent Dark Energy Model can Resolve the Hubble Tension

By Xiaolei Li, A. Shafieloo. Astrophysical Journal, 2019

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Motivated by the current status of cosmological observations and significant tensions in the estimated values of some key parameters assuming the standard ΛCDM model, we propose a simple but radical phenomenological emergent dark energy model where dark energy has no effective presence in the past and emerges at later times. Theoretically, in this phenomenological dark energy model with zero degrees of freedom (similar to a ΛCDM model), one can derive that the equation of state of dark energy increases from in the past to −1 in the future. We show that by setting a hard-cut 2σ lower bound prior for H0 associated with a 97.72% probability from recent local observations, this model can satisfy different combinations of cosmological observations at low and high redshifts (SNe Ia, baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO), Lyα BAO, and cosmic microwave background (CMB)) substantially better than the concordance ΛCDM model with and Δ DIC ∼ −35.38. If there are no substantial systematics in SN Ia, BAO, or Planck CMB data, and assuming the reliability of current local H0 measurements, there is a very high probability that with more precise measurements of the Hubble constant our proposed phenomenological model rules out the cosmological constant with decisive statistical significance and is a strong alternative to explain the combination of different cosmological observations. This simple phenomenologically emergent dark energy model can guide theoretically motivated dark energy model building activities.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/38775c738a1d36f7a26124ec4fe4e9c16e58aa7b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. Schneider
  2. Will J. Percival
  3. Daniel J. Eisenstein
  4. J. Tinker
  5. C. Chuang
  6. J. Brinkmann
  7. J. Brownstein
  8. A. Ross

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. S. Vagnozzi
  2. Tanvi Karwal
  3. Tristan L. Smith
  4. V. Poulin
  5. N. Palanque-Delabrouille
  6. C. Chuang
  7. C. Yéche
  8. J. Brinkmann

Citations in the corpus