Stochastic Estimation of the Maximum of a Regression Function
By J. Kiefer, J. Wolfowitz. 1952
Subfields: Statistics and Probability, Mathematical Optimization
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- Krikamol Muandet
- Yousri Slaoui
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Sham M. Kakade
- Eric Moulines
- Csaba Szepesvari
- Alekh Agarwal
- Robert D. Kleinberg
In Mathematical Optimization
- Alekh Agarwal
- Michael C. Fu
- Eric Moulines
- Warrren B Powell
- Tze Leung Lai
- Lin Xiao
- Dong Yu
- Sigrún Andradóttir
Citations in the corpus
- Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting in Incremental Few-Shot Learning by Finding Flat Minima (2021, methodology): “Standard supervised training with SGD as the optimizer tends to converge to a sharp local minima.”
- Lifelong Graph Learning (2020, neutral): “In the experiments, we find that GCN, APPNP obtain the best overall performance using the SGD optimizer, while MLP, GAT, and FGN performed the best using the Adam optimizer.”
- Continual Learning by Asymmetric Loss Approximation With Single-Side Overestimation (2019, methodology): “With a naı̈ve stochastic gradient descent (SGD) method, deep neural networks easily forget the knowledge obtained from the earlier tasks while adapting to the new information quickly from the incoming tasks [26, 8].”
- Episodic Exploration for Deep Deterministic Policies: An Application to StarCraft Micromanagement Tasks (2016, methodology): “…comes from stochastic gradient-free optimization [14, 21, 30, 9, 11], where the gradient of a differentiable function x ∈ R d (cid:55)→ f ( x ) can be estimated with finite difference methods by where the expectation is taken over the vector u sampled on the unit sphere [21, chapter 9.3].”
- Regret Analysis of Stochastic and Nonstochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problems (2012, neutral): “3 is inspired by gradient-free optimization, a topic extensively studied since [118, 147] — see [31, 67, 138, 140] for recent accounts on this theory.”
- Behaviour Suite for Reinforcement Learning (2019, background): “• sgd : vanilla stochastic gradient descent with learning rate 1e-2 (Kiefer & Wolfowitz, 1952).”
- SequenceR: Sequence-to-Sequence Learning for End-to-End Program Repair (2018, methodology): “Back propagation is used to update the parameters in the network with stochastic gradient decent during training [19].”
- Nearly Tight Bounds for the Continuum-Armed Bandit Problem (2004, methodology): “(3)Readers familiar with Kiefer-Wolfowitz stochastic approximation [17] will note the similarity with our algorithm.”
- QUANTILE ESTIMATION WITH ADAPTIVE IMPORTANCE SAMPLING (2010, methodology): “The solution θ∗ is estimated by a sequence (θn)n≥0, generated, for instance, by a stochastic approximation algorithm of Kiefer–Wolfowitz or Robbins–Monro type.”
- Domain Agnostic Learning with Disentangled Representations (2019, methodology): “We train the class and domain disentanglement component, MINE and the reconstruction component iteratively with Stochasitc Gradient Descent (Kiefer et al., 1952) or Adam (Kingma & Ba, 2014) optimizer.”
- Stability of Stochastic Gradient Descent on Nonsmooth Convex Losses (2020, background): “ is known that one-pass SGD is guaranteed to have optimal excess risk, which can be shown via martingale arguments that trace back to the stochastic approximation literature (Robbins and Monro, 1951; Kiefer and Wolfowitz, 1952). Using our UAS bound, we show that Algorithms 2 and 3 can recover nearly”
- Efficient sparse collective communication and its application to accelerate distributed deep learning (2020, background): “The most common DDL approach is data-parallel training via stochastic gradient descent (SGD) [33].”
- Predicting the Computational Cost of Deep Learning Models (2018, methodology): “Thus, we separately evaluate predictions for only forward passes (Figure 4a,b), and predictions for forward and backward passes with stochastic gradient descent [14] (Figure 4c,d).”
- Dynamic Pricing Without Knowing the Demand Function: Risk Bounds and Near-Optimal Algorithms (2009, unknown): “Under suitable technical conditions on the function M(·) and the sequences {ak} and {ck}, Kiefer and Wolfowitz (1952) showed that the sequence zk → z ∗ in probability as k → ∞.”
- Monte Carlo sampling-based methods for stochastic optimization (2014, methodology): “Robbins and Monro’s problem was actually to find a zero of a given noisy function; Kiefer and Wolfowitz [129] applied the idea to optimization and used finite-difference estimators of the gradient.”