Forecasting Decisions in Conflict Situations: A Comparison of Game Theory, Role-playing, and Unaided Judgement
By Kesten C. Green. 2002
131 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4e1e926df310222b72bdebe5c0f94587cb48aee
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Decision Sciences
In Safety Research
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Findings from Evidence-Based Forecasting: Methods for Reducing Forecast Error (2006, background): “19 In a related study, however, Green (2005) asked game theorists to use game theory to make predictions for eight conflict situations.”
- Decision making and planning under low levels of predictability: enhancing the scenario method (2009, unknown): “Green (2002) showed that when university students were first asked to role-play the participants in six heterogeneous conflict situations, their group-based resolutions of the conflict – or the group-based forecasts of the outcomes of these conflicts – were accurate.”