Computational analysis of wind driven natural ventilation in buildings

By G. Evola, V. Popov. 2006

346 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On the accuracy of CFD simulations of cross-ventilation flows for a generic isolated building: Comparison of RANS, LES and experiments (2017, background): “Evola and Popov [30] found deviations of 8.”
Coupled urban wind flow and indoor natural ventilation modelling on a high-resolution grid: A case study for the Amsterdam ArenA stadium (2010, methodology): “This is probably the reason why in the past, this method has only been used for relatively simple outdoor and indoor environments and relatively large ventilation openings (e.g., Jiang et al. 2003, Allocca et al. 2003, Evola and Popov 2006, Hu et al. 2008, Horan and Finn 2008).”
CFD simulation for pedestrian wind comfort and wind safety in urban areas: General decision framework and case study for the Eindhoven University campus (2012, background): “…2009, Gousseau et al. 2011a, 2011b, Tominaga and Stathopoulos 2011, Moonen et al. 2011), natural ventilation of buildings (e.g. Jiang and Chen 2002, Evola and Popov 2006, Chen 2009, van Hooff and Blocken 2010a, 2010b, Norton et al. 2010, van Hooff et al. 2011a), wind-driven rain on buildings (e.g.…”