Board Reforms and Firm Value: Worldwide Evidence

329 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Do board characteristics drive firm performance? An international perspective (2019, background): “…country, such as Australia, Japan and UK (Kiel and Nicholson 2003; Ullah 2017; Weir and Laing 2001; Chang et al. 2015), while a few papers, as far as we know, have drawn on a sample of several countries (e.g. Fauver et al. 2017; Claessens and Yurtoglu 2013; Kim and Lu 2013; Iliev et al. 2015).”
Rewriting History II: The (Un)Predictable Past of ESG Ratings (2020, background): “Paper Authors Paper Name Paper Stage/Journal Albuquerque et al. (2020) Resiliency of environmental and so- cial stocks: An analysis of the exogenous COVID-19 market crash Review of Corporate Finance Studies Bae et al. (2020) Board reforms and dividend policy: International evidence Journal of Financ”
Corporate governance reform and risk-taking: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in an emerging market (2020, background): “Finally, the literature supports the positive impact of CGR on firm valuation, specifically in the case of emerging markets (Fauver et al., 2017; Black and Khanna, 2007; Dharmapala and Khanna, 2013).”