Two-wave panel analysis: Comparing statistical methods for studying the effects of transitions.

By D. Johnson. 2005

330 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4c49f17b94b9af747d4cc7526b575f8a737b578

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Jeffrey Dew
2. Thomas J. Mowen
3. Christy A. Visher
4. J. Dakin

In Sociology and Political Science

1. J. Dakin
2. Jeffrey Dew
3. Thomas J. Mowen
4. Christy A. Visher

Citations in the corpus

• Drug Use and Crime after Incarceration: The Role of Family Support and Family Conflict (2015, background): “Due to the significant skew in the data, continuous-level analysis change score modeling is inappropriate because the assumptions of heteroskedasticity are violated; even using natural logarithms and robust standard errors fail to capture any validity of this measure (Johnson, 2005).”
• Financial Disagreements and Marital Conflict Tactics (2011, positive): “Further, CS models automatically control any variance related to omitted variables that did not change between W1 and W2; they become the fixed effects estimator when only using two panels (Allison, 1994; Johnson, 2005).”
• Debt Change and Marital Satisfaction Change in Recently Married Couples (2008, methodology): “CS models were used because the research questions deal with within-person change and CS models evaluate only this within-person change (Allison, 1994; Johnson, 2005).”