Judgment and decision making: The dance of affect and reason.

By Melissa L. Finucane, Ellen Peters, Paul Slovic. 2003

234 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4a9a6400e22cb9e8b0866297b779dae25b0918f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. J. Holup
2. Paul Slovic
3. Melissa L. Finucane
4. Sarah K. Howard
5. Ellen Peters
6. Valerie F. Reyna
7. Donald G. MacGregor
8. G. Wong‐Parodi

In General Decision Sciences

1. Paul Slovic
2. Melissa L. Finucane
3. Ellen Peters
4. J. Holup
5. Sarah K. Howard
6. Donald G. MacGregor
7. Valerie F. Reyna
8. G. Wong‐Parodi

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Paul Slovic
2. Ellen Peters
3. Sarah K. Howard
4. J. Holup
5. Melissa L. Finucane
6. Donald G. MacGregor
7. Valerie F. Reyna
8. Frank Farley

Citations in the corpus

• Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making (2006, background): “Based on the seminal work of Bechara, Damasio, Damasio, and Anderson (1994), many theorists are beginning to stress the healthy influences of affect (Finucane et al., 2003; Kahneman, 2003; Peters & Slovic, 2000; see also Isen & Labroo, 2003).”
• Which of These Things Are Not Like the Others? Comparing the Rational, Emotional, and Moral Aspects of Reputation, Status, Celebrity, and Stigma (2019, background): “However theyvary in intensity; emotions involvequalitatively higher levels of arousal and therefore have stronger effects over a more limited range of circumstances, whereas affect has a subtler but more pervasive influence (Camerer et al., 2005; Finucane et al., 2003).”
• Engaging People on Climate Change: The Role of Emotional Responses (2021, background): “Narratives provide images that people use in mental representations of risk (i.e., availability heuristic), and can evoke subjective experiences that influence perceptions of and decisions about hazards (Damasio, 2015; Finucane et al., 2000; Finucane et al., 2003; Loewenstein et al., 2001).”
• Risk-aversion: understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration (2013, background): “The research of Finucane et al. (2000, 2003) considering the affect heuristic has shown that individuals having a positive affective response to an activity are likely to perceive it as less risky and of greater benefit.”
• Risk as Value: Combining Affect and Analysis in Risk Judgments (2006, methodology): “Consistent with Damasio’s hypothesis, Finucane, Slovic, and colleagues (Finucane et al., 2000, 2003; Slovic et al., 2002b) proposed that mental representations of decision stimuli evoke on-line affective experiences that influence people’s perceptions and consequently their judgments and…”
• Affect, risk, and decision making. (2005, background): “Although experiential (affective) and analytic thinking are always ongoing in what Finucane, Peters, and Slovic (2003) characterized as " the dance of affect and reason, " the balance between these dual processes has been shown to be influenced by factors such as age (Peters, Finucane, MacGregor, &…”
• Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality (2004, background): “We now recognize that the experiential mode of thinking and the analytic mode of thinking are continually active, interacting in what we have characterized as “the dance of affect and reason” (Finucane et al., 2003).”
• Beyond Achievement: Entrepreneurship as Extreme Experience (2006, background): “For instance, to what extent does the entrepreneur make decisions and judgments in an experiential mode (based upon positive and negative affective feelings) rather than a rational mode (based on analysis and reason)? Alternatively, does the entrepreneur treat affect as a heuristic that works in tan”