AN EXAMINATION OF THE EFFECTS OF EXPERIENCE AND TASK COMPLEXITY ON AUDIT JUDGMENTS

By M. Seyrani, Khajavi Sh.A., M. Noushadi. 2009

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4839c66ab66efd72c1cc2a466290d1192d28b8c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Jerry Sun
2. S. Cahan

Citations in the corpus

• The Effect of Audit Experience on Audit Fees and Audit Quality (2015, background): “…document that experienced auditors are less likely to agree with the client’s preferred accounting treatment than inexperienced auditors, whereas Abdolmohammadi and Wright (1987) find a negative relation between audit experience and the likelihood of proposing an audit adjustment or qualified…”
• Fifty-Year Overview of Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Accounting (2011, unknown): “Frederick and Libby, 1986; Abdolmohammadi and Wright, 1987). Second, earlier studies focused attention on the role of auditors’ task-specific knowledge in areas such as hypothesis generation (e.g. Libby, 1985) and information search (e.g. Kida, 1984b) and the fact that much of the information used i”