Persistent Systemic Inflammation is Associated with Poor Clinical Outcomes in COPD: A Novel Phenotype

By Alvar Agusti, L. Edwards, S. Rennard, W. Macnee, R. Tal-Singer, B. Miller, Jorgen Vestbo, D. Lomas, P. Calverley, Emiel F. M. Wouters and 7 more. PLoS ONE, 2012

850 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Background Because chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous condition, the identification of specific clinical phenotypes is key to developing more effective therapies. To explore if the persistence of systemic inflammation is associated with poor clinical outcomes in COPD we assessed patients recruited to the well-characterized ECLIPSE cohort (NCT00292552). Methods and Findings Six inflammatory biomarkers in peripheral blood (white blood cells (WBC) count and CRP, IL-6, IL-8, fibrinogen and TNF-α levels) were quantified in 1,755 COPD patients, 297 smokers with normal spirometry and 202 non-smoker controls that were followed-up for three years. We found that, at baseline, 30% of COPD patients did not show evidence of systemic inflammation whereas 16% had persistent systemic inflammation. Even though pulmonary abnormalities were similar in these two groups, persistently inflamed patients during follow-up had significantly increased all-cause mortality (13% vs. 2%, p<0.001) and exacerbation frequency (1.5 (1.5) vs. 0.9 (1.1) per year, p<0.001) compared to non-inflamed ones. As a descriptive study our results show associations but do not prove causality. Besides this, the inflammatory response is complex and we studied only a limited panel of biomarkers, albeit they are those investigated by the majority of previous studies and are often and easily measured in clinical practice. Conclusions Overall, these results identify a novel systemic inflammatory COPD phenotype that may be the target of specific research and treatment.

Subfields: Epidemiology, Immunology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4672830dc24803baa849ce64fff7393bb7c81eb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. M. Spruit
  2. J. op ‘t Roodt
  3. X. Yao
  4. N. Shen
  5. F. Franssen
  6. S. Gaffron
  7. Jiaqi Huang
  8. Vanessa P. M. van Empel

Citations in the corpus