On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery.

By A. Shroyer, F. Grover, B. Hattler, J. Collins, G. McDonald, E. Kozora, J. Lucke, Janet H. Baltz, D. Novitzky. New England Journal of Medicine, 2009

1,038 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f44efdb6d13e20cbc545ccf22df82e593633a0b9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Surgery

1. Judith Hochman
2. M. Creager
3. L. Chawla

Citations in the corpus

• KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. (2013, background): “This potential benefit needs to be balanced against the concern of higher graft occlusion rates using offpump techniques.(80,81)”
• 2011 update to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines. (2011, background): “However, because of concerns about graft patency in OPCABG procedures [11], the body of evidence to support routine OPCABG for blood conservation during coronary revasTable 2.”
• 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesi (2011, background): “In 2009, the results of the largest RCT to date comparing on-pump CABG to off-pump CABG, the ROOBY (Randomized On/Off Bypass) trial, were published, reporting the outcomes for 2,203 patients (99% men) at 18 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (61).”