Combined effects of shade and drought on tulip poplar seedlings : trade-off in tolerance or facilitation?
By M. Holmgren. 2000
167 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f4443411a9ea518b528114bd610177a5f0176b4b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- F. Pugnaire
- Lourens Poorter
- Lars Markesteijn
- Fernando T. Maestre
- Marten Scheffer
- C. Armas
- L. Sack
- L. Cavieres
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- F. Pugnaire
- Fernando T. Maestre
- Richard Michalet
- R. Callaway
- L. Cavieres
- C. Armas
- F. Valladares
- P. Liancourt
Citations in the corpus
- Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future (2007, background): “…affected by potential benefactors (to provide a mechanistic understanding of severity interaction relationships, e.g. Holmgren et al. (1997), Holmgren (2000)), evaluate different performance variables (e.g. survival, growth, physiological status and fitness), attempt to account for factors…”
- Effects of the interaction between drought and shade on water relations, gas exchange and morphological traits in cork oak (Quercus suber L.) seedlings (2005, background): “The interactive effects of shade and drought in growth and physiology of seedlings have been previously described (Gauhl, 1979; Chapin et al., 1987; Holmgren, 2000; Valladares and Pearcy, 2002).”
- Seedling root morphology and biomass allocation of 62 tropical tree species in relation to drought‐ and shade‐tolerance (2009, background): “Experimental evidence suggests that drought- and shade-tolerance are largely unrelated (Holmgren 2000; Sack & Grubb 2002; Sack 2004).”
- Strong facilitation in mild environments: the stress gradient hypothesis revisited (2010, methodology): “Following earlier work (Holmgren, Scheffer & Huston 1997; Holmgren 2000), we assume that growth of a plant increases with the availability of water and light (Fig.”
- Seedling growth and morphology of three oak species along field resource gradients and seed mass variation: a seedling age-dependent response (2010, unknown): “2008) or even low light conditions (Holmgren 2000).”
- Differing effects of shade‐induced facilitation on growth and survival during the establishment of a chenopod shrub (2003, background): “1998), and has complex effects on plants through photosynthesis and morphological plasticity (Holmgren 2000; Ryser & Eek 2000).”
- STRESS TOLERANCE AND COMPETITIVE-RESPONSE ABILITY DETERMINE THE OUTCOME OF BIOTIC INTERACTIONS (2005, background): “Holmgren et al. (1997) proposed a conceptual model dealing with the interplay of competition and facilitation along a water gradient, based on a trade-off between shade and drought tolerance for nurse species canopies (trees or shrubs) and seedlings (see also Holmgren 2000).”
- Responses of temperate woody seedlings to shade and drought: do trade‐offs limit potential niche differentiation? (2004, background): “However, another hypothesis predicts the opposite pattern / a weaker impact of drought in deeper shade, because shaded plants are protected from factors which can aggravate the impact of drought, such as high leaf and air temperatures, high vapour pressure deficit, and oxidative stresses (Holmgren 2”
- Linkage between water stress tolerance and life history type in seedlings of nine chaparral species (Rhamnaceae) (2008, result): “However, as in other recent studies (Holmgren 2000; Sack & Grubb 2002; Hastwell & Facelli 2003; SánchezGómez et al. 2006), we did not find evidence to support this prediction, and instead shaded plant water stress, grown without competition, was less intense compared to plants in full sun.”