The effects of rapport-building style on children's reports of a staged event†

By Kim P. Roberts, M. Lamb, K. J. Sternberg. 2004

156 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does enhanced rapport-building alter the dynamics of investigative interviews with suspected victims of intra-familial abuse? (2013, unknown): “…interview to share personally meaningful information in detail and are prompted using open-ended questions to elaborate on it (Hershkowitz, 2009; Roberts, Lamb & Sternberg, 2004; Sternberg et al., 1997), 2) interviewers say less and instead encourage children to talk (Teoh & Lamb, 2010), and 3)…”
Evaluation of a comprehensive interactive training system for investigative interviewers of children (2015, background): “Excessive use of children’s cognitive resources when providing a practice narrative may result in inattentiveness during questioning about alleged abuse (Hershkowitz, 2009; Roberts et al., 2004).”
35. Interviewing children. (2014, methodology): “Interviewers must be careful, however, to keep the practice to about five minutes because more lengthy rapport building can fatigue children (Hershkowitz 2009, Roberts et al. 2004).”
A comfortable witness is a good witness: rapport‐building and susceptibility to misinformation in an investigative mock‐crime interview (2008, background): “direct) during the rapportbuilding phase of the interview (Roberts, Lamb, & Sternberg, 2004; Sternberg et al., 1997). For example, Sternberg et al. (1997) presented children with a staged event followed by a rapport-building phase consisting of either openended questions (e.”