Nonresponse weighting adjustment using estimated response probability

By Jae Kwang Kim, Jay-J. Kim. 2007

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f43d4c523451d97219ea4d012cf6537edf1f60e0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. David Haziza
2. Xiao-Li Meng
3. Jae Kwang Kim

In Statistics and Probability

1. David Haziza
2. Xiao-Li Meng
3. Jae Kwang Kim
4. Zhiqiang Tan
5. Andrew Gelman
6. James P. Hobert
7. Changbao Wu
8. Yilin Chen

Citations in the corpus

• Statistical paradises and paradoxes in big data (I): Law of large populations, big data paradox, and the 2016 US presidential election (2018, background): “But it is rarely possible to do so when the weights themselves are subject to errors, typically much larger than O(N−1) for large N [see Kim and Kim (2007), Kim and Riddles (2012)].”
• Doubly robust inference with missing data in survey sampling (2014, background): “As discussed in Kim and Kim (2007) and Kim and Riddles (2012), the choice of φ̂MLE does not necessarily lead to the optimal propensity score estimators.”