Internal borders for managing invasive marine species

By Barrie M. Forrest, J. Gardner, Michael D. Taylor. 2009

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Raising the flag on marine alien fouling species (2017, background): “The sheltered environment and diverse substrates that harbours provide (Arenas et al. 2006), together with the confluence of multiple and often high frequency vectors (Bax et al. 2003; Bulleri and Chapman 2010) make harbours foci of marine invasions (Forrest et al. 2009; López-Legentil et al. 2015).”
Marine invasion genetics: from spatio-temporal patterns to evolutionary outcomes (2014, background): “Some studies report a complex interplay of primary and secondary introductions (also called pre-border and post-border stages, see Forrest et al. 2009), with the former transfer happening unidirectionally (from the native to the introduced range), while the latter occurs within the introduced range.”
Thermogeography predicts the potential global range of the invasive European green crab (Carcinus maenas) (2010, background): “A major impediment to the detection of new species is that border control is difficult to enforce across the permeable and large spatial extent of marine territories (Hewitt et al., 2004; Forrest et al., 2009).”
Concepts for biocontrol in marine environments: is there a way forward? (2015, unknown): “Biocontrol to contain or reduce spread Decreases in population sizes of marine pests by biocontrol or other management methods are expected to translate to a reduction of spread (Forrest et al. 2009; Forrest and Hopkins 2013; Johnston et al. 2009).”