Dinophysis blooms in the deep euphotic zone of the Baltic Sea: Do they grow in the dark?

By L. Gisselson, P. Carlsson, E. Granéli, J. Pallon. 2002

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Phytoplankton vertical distributions and composition in Baltic Sea cyanobacterial blooms (2007, background): “According to Gisselson et al. (2002), photosynthesis supports a low Dinophysis growth rate (m = 0.10–0.17 day 1) in the Baltic Sea seasonal pycnocline, heterotrophic nutrition is needed for higher growth rates (m = up to 0.4 day 1).”
Distribution and host diversity of Amoebophryidae parasites across oligotrophic waters of the Mediterranean Sea (2010, background): “Only 0.5–2% of the population ofDinophysis norvegicawas removed by parasitism in the Baltic Sea (Gisselson et al., 2002), and during the decline of the bloom of Neoceratium falcatiforme(ex.”
Misuse of the phytoplankton-zooplankton dichotomy : the need to assign organisms as mixotrophs within plankton functional types (2013, background): “…contributions of mixotrophs to system dynamics and functionality have been shown to be important (Stoecker et al., 1997; Jeong et al., 1999, 2005a, b, 2010a, b; Gisselson et al., 2002; Smalley et al., 2003; Zubkov and Tarran, 2008; Glibert et al., 2009; Rokitta et al., 2011; Hartmann et al., 2012).”
Phagotrophy in harmful algae (2006, methodology): “of food vacuoles with light and electron microscopy Jacobsen and Andersen 1994; Gisselson et al. 2002 ”