Simple and complex reciprocity in primates

93 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Nonhuman Species’ Reactions to Inequity and their Implications for Fairness (2006, background): “…are also highly cooperative and, as inequity aversion is proposed to promote human cooperation, it seemed logical to first look at two cooperative species (Boesch, 1994; Brosnan and Waal, 2002; de Waal and Berger, 2000; de Waal and Brosnan,2006; de Waal and Davis, 2002; Mendres and de Waal, 2000).”
Chimpanzees coordinate in a negotiation game (2009, background): “…2006 although see Gilby, 2006), possibly even involving some kind of mental scorekeeping (so-called calculated reciprocity, de Waal, 1997; de Waal & Brosnan, 2006; see Koyama, Caws, & Aureli, 2006; Melis, Hare, & Tomasello, 2008), there is no evidence that they understand the long-term…”
Do friends help each other? Patterns of female coalition formation in wild bonobos at Wamba (2016, background): “Males who are more frequently associated spatially and who groom each other are more likely to form coalitions (Hemelrijk & Ek, 1991; Nishida, 1983; Watts, 2002), and they support each other reciprocally (Mitani, 2006; de Waal & Brosnan, 2006; Watts, 2002).”