How to choose a biodiversity indicator – Redundancy and complementarity of biodiversity metrics in a freshwater ecosystem

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Biodiversity of traits and species both show weak responses to hydromorphological alteration in lowland river macroinvertebrates (2014, background): “Therefore, we can conclude that the paradigm that biodiversity declines under environmental degradation (Bunn & Arthington, 2002; Marchant, 2007; Gallardo et al., 2011) is not universal and should be revisited.”
Functional diversity: a review of methodology and current knowledge in freshwater macroinvertebrate research (2016, background): “…functional diversity (Haybach et al., 2004; Bêche & Resh, 2007; Heino, 2008; Bazzanti et al. 2009; Bêche & Statzner, 2009; Vandewalle et al., 2010; Gallardo et al., 2011; Feld et al., 2014), while others revealed a positive and saturating relationship (Bady et al., 2005; Bêche & Statzner,…”
Aquatic insects indicate terrestrial habitat degradation: changes in taxonomical structure and functional diversity of dragonflies in tropical rainforest of East Kalimantan (2012, background): “However, other biodiversity metrics, such as functional diversity, are independent of sampling effort, require low identification effort, are easy to calculate, and allow comparisons among sites of different taxonomic composition (Gallardo et al. 2011).”