Recognizing engagement in human-robot interaction

By Charles Rich, Brett Ponsleur, Aaron Holroyd, C. Sidner. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2010

312 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Human Gaze Assisted Artificial Intelligence: A Review (2020, background): “Social gaze between humans is relatively well studied, and a similar effort has been made for understanding human gaze when interacting with robots [Rich et al. , 2010].”
Social eye gaze in human-robot interaction (2017, methodology): “Observations of gaze in tutoring scenarios have been collected for student-teacher pairs covering topics as varied as paper making (Huang & Mutlu, 2014), board games (Admoni & Scassellati, 2014), and preparing canap´es (Rich & Ponsler, 2010).”
Collaborative Effort towards Common Ground in Situated Human-Robot Dialogue (2014, background): “Non-verbal modalities such as gesture and gaze have been investigated extensively in HRI literature, for example, for engagement [1, 19, 23], and turn taking and participation [16].”
Over-reliance on English hinders cognitive science. (2022, unknown): “Social robots, in order to ﬁ t different cultural contexts, need to adhere to language-speci ﬁ c rules beyond presumed general principles of conversation (e.g., [111,112,202]).”