Governance, technology and citizen behavior in pandemic: Lessons from COVID-19 in East Asia
By R. Shaw, Yong-Kyun Kim, Jinling Hua. Progress in Disaster Science, 2020
414 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Corona Virus (CODID-19) was first reported in Wuhan in December 2019, then spread in different parts of China, and gradually became a global pandemic in March 2020. While the death toll is still increasing, the epicenter of casualty has shifted from Asia to Europe, and that of the affected people has shifted to USA. This paper analyzes the responses in East Asian countries, in China, Japan and South Korea, and provides some commonalities and lessons. While countries have different governance mechanism, it was found that a few governance decisions in respective countries made a difference, along with strong community solidarity and community behavior. Extensive use of emerging technologies is made along with medical/health care treatment to make the response more effective and reduce the risk of the spread of the disease. Although the pandemic was a global one, its responses were local, depending on the local governance, socio-economic and cultural context.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Information Systems, Modeling and Simulation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f40e454829c9a20aa2b52b0b4c685c776fd9bc1a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation (2020, neutral): “[62] mentioned that there will be a tsunami of”
- Changes in air passenger demand as a result of the COVID-19 crisis: using Big Data to inform tourism policy (2020, background): “The rapid spread of COVID-19 is partly due to our mobile lifestyles (Shaw et al., 2020).”