Carabid beetles : Their ecology, survival and use in agroecosystems

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The need for effective marking and tracking techniques for monitoring the movements of insect predators and parasitoids (2004, background): “These predators have attracted a very large volume of agroecological research (Holland, 2002) and dispersal studies have comprised much of this, with marking and tracking techniques being pivotal to much of that work.”
Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale (2007, background): “Many years of sampling of carabids in Europe have demonstrated decreased diversity and reversed dominance patterns over time (Desender and Turin, 1989; Holland, 2002).”
Feeding Preferences of Weed Seed Predators and Effect on Weed Emergence (2007, background): “Finally, few of these three carabid beetle species may have been present within these field sites, as field borders may have provided food sources (Holland 2002; Menalled et al. 2006).”
Landscape heterogeneity as an ecological filter of species traits (2014, unknown): “Landscapes dominated by annual 374 crops and grasslands selected highly mobile carabid species (small, macropterous), which are 375 able to adapt to rapidly changing spatial distributions in resources (Holland, 2002).”
Farm‐scale spatiotemporal dynamics of predatory beetles in arable crops (2005, background): “This was evident when insect abundance across a 64-km block of arable farmland was measured annually for 30 years (Holland 2002).”