Regional Integration and Development

By M. Dutta. 2005

336 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The ‘new East Asian regionalism’: A political domino effect (2010, background): “…‘critical relationships are often specified with no empirical justification; many crucial variables cannot be measured satisfactorily; the level of sectoral detail is often rather low . . . and the specification of the behavioral relationships is usually very simple’ (Schiff and Winters, 2003: 49).”
Exchanging development for market access? Deep integration and industrial policy under multilateral and regional-bilateral trade agreements (2005, neutral): “…the instrument for evaluation, with the underlying point being that the object of trade policy is (or should be) to increase efficient use of resources and thereby maximize exchange (e.g. Frankel, 1997; Panagariya, 1999, 2002; Dee and Gali, 2003; Hilaire and Yang, 2003; Schiff and Winters, 2003).”
When comparative advantage is not enough: business costs in small remote economies (2004, background): “Andriamananjara and Schiff (2001) and Schiff and Winters (2003) argue strongly that by combining various functions 27 See Briguglio et al. (1996).”
Foreign Direct Investment in Sub-Saharan Africa: Motivating Factors and Policy Issues (2009, background): “However, SSA’s fragmented and overlapping trade agreements (Schiff and Winters, 2003) and trade initiatives, driven by actors outside SSA, mean that SSA policy makers are at a disadvantage in crafting policies to attract FDI.”