WILL THE REAL EMPATHY PLEASE STAND UP? A CASE FOR A NARROW CONCEPTUALIZATION

By Amy Coplan. 2011

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f407ebb51b5169f428102fd287927b1397c7f455

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. B. Cuff
2. Ana Paiva
3. Sarah D. Brown
4. D. Howat
5. Laura K. Taylor
6. Iolanda Leite
7. H. Maibom

In Psychiatry and Mental health

1. H. Maibom

In Social Psychology

1. Hana Boukricha
2. Iolanda Leite
3. Ipke Wachsmuth
4. B. Cuff
5. Ana Paiva
6. Sarah D. Brown
7. D. Howat
8. Laura K. Taylor

Citations in the corpus

• Empathy in Virtual Agents and Robots (2017, background): “Such an inclusive view of empathy is not completely shared by other researchers, such as Coplan, who considers that grouping all the low-level processes involved in empathy together with higher level ones “is not the best way to highlight their importance” (Coplan 2011).”
• The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Empathy (2017, background): “It gets triggered by direct sensory engagement with another person expressing an emotion, and consequently requires a direct perception of the other (Coplan 2011, p. 46).”
• Empathy: A Review of the Concept (2016, background): “Nevertheless, the degree of congruency is dependent upon factors such as personal experience, imagination, simulation (Coplan, 2011) and the resources available for the verbal sharing of emotions.”