Formation and Evolution of Galaxy Dark Matter Halos and Their Substructure

By J. Diemand, Michael Kuhlen, P. Madau. 2007

511 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We use the "Via Lactea" simulation to study the co-evolution of a Milky Way-sized ΛCDM halo and its subhalo population. While most of the host halo mass is accreted over the first 6 Gyr in a series of major mergers, the physical mass distribution [not Mvir(z)] remains practically constant since z = 1. The same is true in a large sample of ΛCDM galaxy halos. Subhalo mass loss peaks between the turnaround and virialization epochs of a given mass shell, and the abundance of substructure within the shell freezes afterward. Of the z = 1 subhalos, 97% have a surviving bound remnant at the present epoch. The retained mass fraction is larger for initially lighter subhalos: today satellites with maximum circular velocities Vmax = 10 km s-1 at z = 1 have about 40% of the mass they had back then. At the first pericenter passage a larger average mass fraction is lost than during each following orbit. Tides remove mass in the substructure from the outside in, leading to higher concentrations compared to field halos of the same mass. This effect, combined with the earlier formation epoch of the inner satellites, results in strongly increasing subhalo concentrations toward the Galactic center. We present individual evolutionary tracks and present-day properties of the likely hosts of the dwarf satellites around the Milky Way. The formation histories of "field halos" that lie beyond the Via Lactea host today are found to strongly depend on the density of their environment. This is caused by tidal mass loss that affects many field halos on eccentric orbits.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3edca562adf1a671aa7428a26609365e81c42c9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. Volker Springel
  3. James S. Bullock
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. Simon D. M. White
  6. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  7. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  8. R. Somerville

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. James S. Bullock
  3. Volker Springel
  4. Simon D. M. White
  5. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  6. L. Hernquist
  7. F. V. D. Bosch
  8. Andrey V. Kravtsov

Citations in the corpus