Comparison of morphological and DNA metabarcoding analyses of diets in exploited marine fishes

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

DNA metabarcoding in diet studies: Unveiling ecological aspects in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems (2019, background): “Generally, the most common result from comparisons between traditional morphological analyses and molecular‐based method‐ ologies is a higher taxonomic resolution and, consequently, the disclosure of higher prey diversity (e.g., Berry et al., 2015; Zeale et al., 2011).”
Standardising fish stomach content analysis: The importance of prey condition (2017, background): “While it is accepted that stomach content analysis will never produce an exact picture of diet, the improvements such techniques could offer to current food web understanding (Carreon-Martinez et al., 2011; Berry et al., 2015) warrant consideration.”