Electroweak baryogenesis in two Higgs doublet models and B meson anomalies

By J. Cline, K. Kainulainen, Michael Trott. 2011

220 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A bstractMotivated by 3.9σ evidence of a CP-violating phase beyond the standard model in the like-sign dimuon asymmetry reported by D∅, we examine the potential for two Higgs doublet models (2HDMs) to achieve successful electroweak baryogenesis (EWBG) while explaining the dimuon anomaly. Our emphasis is on the minimal flavour violating 2HDM, but our numerical scans of model parameter space include type I and type II models as special cases. We incorporate relevant particle physics constraints, including electroweak precision data, b → sγ, the neutron electric dipole moment, Rb, and perturbative coupling bounds to constrain the model. Surprisingly, we find that a large enough baryon asymmetry is only consistently achieved in a small subset of parameter space in 2HDMs, regardless of trying to simultaneously account for any B physics anomaly. There is some tension between simultaneous explanation of the dimuon anomaly and baryogenesis, but using a Markov chain Monte Carlo we find several models within 1σ of the central values. We point out shortcomings with previous studies that reached different conclusions. The restricted parameter space that allows for EWBG makes this scenario highly predictive for collider searches. We discuss the most promising signatures to pursue at the LHC for EWBG-compatible models.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3e1b63f44b63c595b1ebc53e9ddaf4c4be66272

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. T. Konstandin
  2. S. Huber
  3. C. Caprini
  4. Igor P. Ivanov
  5. J. No
  6. G. Servant
  7. Marek Lewicki
  8. John Ellis

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. T. Konstandin
  2. J. No
  3. C. Caprini
  4. Igor P. Ivanov
  5. S. Huber
  6. M. Hindmarsh
  7. G. Servant
  8. G. Nardini

Citations in the corpus