Trolls just want to have fun
By Erin E. Buckels, P. Trapnell, D. Paulhus. 2014
834 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3be8a0681e19cd22a57a510ea70fd45f49a2c60
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- R. Rogoza
- Jan Cieciuch
- Donald Saklofske
- Martin M. Smith
- Leon Derczynski
- Natalie Sest
- Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil
- Justin Cheng
In Social Psychology
- R. Rogoza
- Jan Cieciuch
- Leon Derczynski
- Natalie Sest
- Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil
- Jure Leskovec
- Kristina Lerman
- Björn Gambäck
In Sociology and Political Science
- Aseel Addawood
- Kristina Lerman
- R. Rogoza
- Jan Cieciuch
- Adam Badawy
- Leon Derczynski
- Natalie Sest
- Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil
Citations in the corpus
- Directions in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Out (2020, methodology): “this regard, ‘flagged’ content is akin to the concept of ‘trolling’, which covers a wide range of behaviours, from jokes and playful interventions through to sinister personal attacks such as doxxing [21]. Some forms of trolling can be measured with tools such as the Global Assessment of Internet Tr”
- Partisan Polarization Is the Primary Psychological Motivation behind Political Fake News Sharing on Twitter (2020, methodology): “Tomeasure apolitical trolling behavior, we solicited the “cyber-bullying” literature and implemented a fouritem trolling scale (Buckels, Trapnell, and Paulhus 2014), asking participants whether they agreed or disagreed with statements like “I like to troll people in forums or the comments section…”
- A Survey on Troll Detection (2020, background): “A troll has been defined as an individual who displays a negative online behaviour [8], or as a user who initially pretends to be a legitimate participant, but later attempts to disrupt the community, not in a blatant way, but aiming to attract the maximum number of responses from the other comm”
- Antisocial Behavior in Online Discussion Communities (2015, background): “Trolls have also been characterized as “creatures who take pleasure in upsetting others” (Kir-man, Lineham, and Lawson 2012), and indeed, recent work has found that sadism is strongly associated with trolling tendencies (Buckels, Trapnell, and Paulhus 2014).”
- Constructing the cyber-troll: Psychopathy, sadism, and empathy (2017, methodology): “Also corroborating previous research (e.g., Buckels et al., 2014; Craker & March, 2016), trait psychopathy and sadism were significant positive predictors of trolling behaviour.”
- Dark Triad traits and their structure: An empirical approach (2020, background): “On the other hand, some researchers argued that there are more than three dark traits, and the Dark Triad should be extended to include status-driven risk taking (Visser et al. 2014) or everyday sadism (Buckels et al. 2014).”
- Using Convolutional Neural Networks to Classify Hate-Speech (2017, background): “Similarly, Buckels et al. (2014) aimed to extract traits from online user behaviour that would indicate antisocial personality.”
- Which personality traits are related to traditional bullying and cyberbullying? A study with the Big Five, Dark Triad and sadism (2017, background): “In line with this, sadism has been found uniquely related to internet trolling (Buckels et al., 2014), the willingness to hurt innocent people (Buckels et al., , 2013), and juvenile delinquency (Chabrol et al., 2009) when Dark Triad traits were controlled for in the analyses.”
- The Assessment of Sadistic Personality: Preliminary psychometric evidence for a new measure (2017, result): “…2014), research supports the incremental validity of sadism in the prediction of a series of maladaptive behaviours, including “trolling” online, adolescent delinquency, and unprovoked aggression (Buckels et al., 2013; Buckels et al., 2014; Chabrol et al., 2009; Reidy, Zeichner, & Seibert, 2011).”
- Detecting Offensive Content in Open-domain Conversations using Two Stage Semi-supervision (2018, neutral): “There has also been a line of work on extracting user level features to identify people exhibiting abusive behavior (Chen et al., 2012; Buckels et al., 2014; Papegnies et al., 2017).”
- Trolling on Tinder® (and other dating apps): Examining the role of the Dark Tetrad and impulsivity (2017, methodology): “Regardless, the current study has shown that women's trolling behaviours on these apps are higher compared to other online areas such as forums, gaming (Buckels et al., 2014), and Facebook (Craker & March, 2016).”