Hubbell's fundamental biodiversity parameter and the Simpson diversity index

By Fangliang He, Xin-Sheng Hu. 2005

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3a2595a8ec40074824965810ca747a121f64e41

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Fangliang He
2. Xin-Sheng Hu
3. S. Kidwell
4. A. Tomašovỳch
5. Stephen P. Hubbell
6. Jérôme Chave
7. Salvador Pueyo
8. Pierre Legendre

In Genetics

1. S. Kidwell
2. Fangliang He
3. Xin-Sheng Hu
4. A. Tomašovỳch
5. Stephen P. Hubbell

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Fangliang He
2. Xin-Sheng Hu
3. S. Kidwell
4. A. Tomašovỳch
5. Stephen P. Hubbell
6. Jérôme Chave
7. Charles D. Canham
8. Salvador Pueyo

Citations in the corpus

• Neutral theory in macroecology and population genetics (2006, background): “Because of the monotonic relationship between the Simpson index and 0 (He and Hu 2005), the effective community size so defined is in essence the fixed community size J of Hubbell.”
• Predicting the effects of increasing temporal scale on species composition, diversity, and rank-abundance distributions (2010, background): “…(sample) size ( J), here represented by the average density of individuals in the living assemblage collected at the roughly meter-scale spatial resolution of one station; (2) the biodiversity number (h); and (3) the dispersal number (I) (Hubbell 2001; Etienne and Olff 2004a; He and Hu 2005).”