Small scale additions of native plants fail to increase beneficial insect richness in urban gardens
By K. Matteson, G. Langellotto. 2011
132 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f39ec8c72b77c2e8ea3f5bb558b70c2a3558218e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Enhancing urban biodiversity and its influence on city-dwellers: An experiment (2014, background): “For pollinators, while other studies found that sowing flower meadows (Matteson and Langellotto, 2011), introducing nest-boxes or allowing nettle growing (Gaston et al.”
- Patterns of pollinator turnover and increasing diversity associated with urban habitats (2017, background): “Consistent with Matteson and Langellotto (2011), bees were strongly associated with flowers irrespective of their origins (e.g. Daucus carota, Eutrochium maculatum, Hypericum kalmianum, Solidago, Thymus serpyllum), all of which are amenable to municipal programs aimed at supporting bee diversity.”
- Quantifying nectar production by flowering plants in urban and rural landscapes (2021, unknown): “…plant species are less valuable to most flower-feeding insects than their native counterparts (Garbuzov & Ratnieks, 2014; Majewska & Altizer, 2018; Matteson & Langellotto, 2011), although their prevalence in urban areas could drive changes in pollinator community composition (Seitz et al., 2020;…”