Explicit cross-property correlations for anisotropic two-phase composite materials

224 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Normal and tangential compliances of interface of rough surfaces with contacts of elliptic shape (2008, background): “…plates and K ¼ K=N is the interface area per one contact, therefore the contribution of the contact zone to the overall compliance depends on the plate thickness l. Expression (4.5) generalizes parameter n ¼ K l ffiffi A ph i for the circular contacts introduced by Sevostianov and Kachanov (2002).”
On approximate symmetries of the elastic properties and elliptic orthotropy (2008, background): “This leads to much larger number of terms (so that the number of fitting parameters may be quite large) and the possibility to omit them remains unclear without the micromechanical analyses (see Kachanov and Sevostianov [16] for a discussion in detail).”
On quantitative characterization of microstructures and effective properties (2005, methodology): “• Orthotropy holds, with some approximation, for a material with 3-D spheroidal inhomogeneities in the isotropic matrix ( Sevostianov and Kachanov, 2002a, b).”
Effective elastic properties of matrix composites with transversely-isotropic phases (2005, methodology): “To calculate effective elastic properties of inhomogeneous material it is convenient to use property contribution tensors Hijkl and Nijkl (see Sevostianov and Kachanov, 2002; Kachanov et al., 2004)”